1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 178 F.2d
  5. 178 F.2d 949 (1949)
 

APPLICATION OF PIKE

Patent Appeal No. 5635.

178 F.2d 949 (1949)

Application of PIKE et al.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

December 12, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold S. Worfolk, New York City (Edmund H. Parry, Jr., Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellants.

E. L. Reynolds, Washington, D. C. (Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Chief Judge, and JACKSON, O'CONNELL, and JOHNSON, Judges.

O'CONNELL, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of all of the claims, Nos. 13-15, 17-20, and 22-24, in appellants' application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to adhesive compositions containing butadiene copolymers.

Claims 14, 15, and 18 were rejected as being drawn to nonelected species and, therefore, need not be considered here...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases