1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 178 F.2d
  5. 178 F.2d 926 (1949)
 

DUNCAN COFFEE CO. v. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORP.

No. 500.

178 F.2d 926 (1949)

DUNCAN COFFEE CO. v. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION.

United States Emergency Court of Appeals.

Decided December 16, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel H. Peak, Houston, Tex., for complainant.

George Arthur Fruit, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., with whom Joseph M. Friedman, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, was on the brief, and William G. Winters, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Houston, Texas, for respondent.

Before MARIS, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and LINDLEY, Judges.

Heard at Houston, Texas, September 29, 1949.

McALLISTER, Judge.

Complainant, Duncan Coffee Company, brought suit in this court* to review the denial by respondent, Reconstruction Finance Corporation, of respondent's contractual liability to complainant under a coffee subsidy contract. The liability was determined to be $189,194.64. Complainant admits a liability of $110,135.28, and seeks, therefore, to recover the difference of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases