1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 86 F.Supp.
  5. 86 F.Supp. 992 (1949)
 

C. V. HILL & CO. v. ROYAL STORE EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTORS

Civ. No. 1619.

86 F.Supp. 992 (1949)

C. V. HILL & CO., Inc. v. ROYAL STORE EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTORS OF CINCINNATI, OHIO et al.

United States District Court. S. D. Ohio, W. D.

November 9, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allen & Allen and Theodore Greve, Cincinnati, Ohio, for C. V. Hill & Co., Inc., plaintiff.

Wood, Arey, Herron, & Evans, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant and defendant counterclaimant.

Lewis E. Lyon, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant counterclaimant, Weber Showcase & Fixture Co., Inc.

DRUFFEL, District Judge.

The Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:

Findings of Fact.

1. The jurisdiction of this Court is based on the patent laws of the United States.

The Court has jurisdiction over the parties and of the subject matter.

This action as to Royal Store Equipment Distributors, one of the original defendants, was dismissed on stipulation of the parties.

2. Plaintiff, C. V. Hill ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases