THEAMAN v. HINDELS


276 A.D. 758 (1949)

Herman Theaman, Appellant, v. George W. Hindels, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 16, 1949.


We think the defect in the summons was not jurisdictional. Ordinarily, therefore, it would have been in order to permit the plaintiff to supply the omission on proper terms. In this case, by reason of the vacating of the premises, the action in ejectment became moot and the court could exercise its discretion in granting defendant's motion to set aside the service of the summons.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements, and the motion to dismiss...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases