1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 172 F.2d
  5. 172 F.2d 862 (1949)
 

MAJESTIC MFG. CO. v. MAJESTIC ELECTRIC APPLIANCE CO.

No. 10731.

172 F.2d 862 (1949)

MAJESTIC MFG. CO. v. MAJESTIC ELECTRIC APPLIANCE CO., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

March 7, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Estill E. Ezell and Edmund C. Rogers, both of St. Louis, Mo. (Estill E. Ezell and Edmund C. Rogers, both of St. Louis, Mo., and Hubert E. Evans and Lloyd L. Evans, both of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

Bruce B. Krost, of Cleveland Ohio (George V. Woodling and Bruce B. Krost, both of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.

Before SIMONS, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, plaintiff below in a suit for trade-mark infringement and unfair competition, appeals from a judgment of dimissal upon a record which shows little or no controversy in the controlling facts recited by the court in its memorandum opinion and here summarized.

The appellant for more than 50 years has manufactured coal and gas stoves and ranges and a limited number of related items. It had, before the last war, fabricated electric plates...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases