1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 83 F.Supp.
  5. 83 F.Supp. 949 (1949)
 

UNITED STATES v. THOMAS STEEL CORPORATION

Civ. A. No. 24760.

83 F.Supp. 949 (1949)

UNITED STATES v. THOMAS STEEL CORPORATION et al.

United States District Court N. D. Ohio, E. D.

January 12, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Don C. Miller, U. S. Atty., of Cleveland, Ohio, and John F. Sonnett, Roy C. Hackley, Jr., and Alfred C. Aurich, all of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Earl W. LeFever, of Cleveland, Ohio, Hoyt A. Moore, of New York City, John B. Putnam, Andrews, Hadden & Putnam, Andrew P. Martin, Frank Harrison and Squire, Sanders, & Dempsey, all of Cleveland, Ohio, William H. Webb, of Pittsburgh, Pa., Franklin B. Powers, of Youngstown, Ohio, Howard F. Burns, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Wm. J. Kyle, Jr., of Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendants.

WILKIN, District Judge.

It appearing that the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in a decision rendered December 6, 1948, in United States v. Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company et al., 6 Cir., 171 F.2d 103, has ruled that the Royalty Adjustment Act, 35 U.S.C.A. § 89 et seq., and the orders made thereunder are not applicable to moneys resulting from the settlement of claims for patent infringement, and

It further appearing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases