1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 178 F.2d
  5. 178 F.2d 854 (1949)
 

MONOLITH PORTLAND M. CO. v. RECONSTRUCTION FIN. CORP.

No. 12200.

178 F.2d 854 (1949)

MONOLITH PORTLAND MIDWEST CO. v. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

December 21, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward R. Young, Alfred L. Black, Jr., Joseph T. Enright and Donald J. Dunne, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Allan E. Charles, John F. Porter, San Francisco, Cal., R. C. Goodale, Washington, D. C., Lillick, Geary & McHose, Benjamin & Lieberman, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before HEALY and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges, and GOODMAN, District Judge.

GOODMAN, District Judge.

Whether a contractor may maintain a court action against the United States for damages because of the termination by the United States of a war contract pursuant to the War Mobilization and Reconversion Act of 1944, 58 Stat. 785, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 1651 et seq., or whether relief ab initio can only be sought administratively under the Contract Settlement Act of 1944, 41 U.S.C.A. § 101 et seq., 58 Stat. 649, is the main question...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases