1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 93 F.Supp.
  5. 93 F.Supp. 9 (1949)
 

PERGAMENT v. FRAZER

No. 7354.

93 F.Supp. 9 (1949)

PERGAMENT et al. v. FRAZER et al.

United States District Court E. D. Michigan, S. D.

October 12, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel L. Chess, New York City, Perlman, Goodman, Hecht & Chesler, Chicago, Ill., and Fischer & Fischer, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiffs.

George E. Brand and George E. Brand, Jr., Detroit, Mich., for defendants Permanente Products Company and the Permanente Metals Corporation.

Edward T. Kane, U. S. Atty., and Roger P. O'Connor, Asst. U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., for defendants United States of America and Reconstruction Finance Corporation.

Dykema, Jones & Wheat, Detroit, Mich., for defendant Otis & Co.

PICARD, District Judge.

Defendants, United States of America, Reconstruction Finance Corporation, "Metals," and "Products" respectively move to dismiss the above action as against each of them for the reasons announced in this memorandum and order. This court believes that the extensive briefs filed by "Metals," "Products" and plaintiffs so completely cover the issues that we deem it unnecessary needlessly to add to the task of the courts to which this matter may...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases