RICE v. RICE

No. 117.

336 U.S. 674 (1949)

RICE v. RICE.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 18, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel D. Morgan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Thomas F. Seymour.

Ralph H. Clark and Samuel A. Persky argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

The question for decision here is whether the courts of Connecticut gave to a Nevada divorce decree the full faith and credit required by Art. IV, § 1 of the Constitution. Respondent brought the action in a Connecticut Superior Court, seeking a declaratory judgment that a decree of divorce entered against her and in favor of her husband, the late Herbert N. Rice, by a Nevada court is not entitled to full...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases