EISENBERG v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Nos. 9900, 9899.

174 F.2d 827 (1949)

Morris EISENBERG, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. Herman SCHAEFFER, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided May 9, 1949.

Rehearing Denied August 16, 1949.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman S. Altman, Washington, D. C. (Harry Shapiro, Hirsh W. Stalberg, David V. Shapiro, and Shapiro, Conner, Rosenfeld & Stalberg, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner.

Sumner N. Redstone, Washington, D. C. (Theron Lamar Caudle, Assistant Attorney General, and Ellis N. Slack, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before MARIS, GOODRICH, and McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

The question raised by these petitions is whether the partnership interests held by the trusts created by the petitioners for their children are entitled to tax recognition under the doctrine of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Tower, 1946, 327 U.S. 280, 66 S.Ct. 532, 90 L.Ed. 670, 164 A.L.R. 1135, and Lusthaus v. Commissioner, 1946, 327 U.S. 293, 66 S.Ct. 539, 90 L.Ed. 679. Upon the findings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases