1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 76 F.Supp.
  5. 76 F.Supp. 816 (1948)
 

LOFTIS v. UNITED STATES

No. 46078.

76 F.Supp. 816 (1948)

LOFTIS v. UNITED STATES.

Court of Claims.

April 5, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

N. A. Townsend, of Washington, D. C. (Gardner, Morrison & Rogers, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for plaintiff.

Brice Toole, of Washington, D. C., and John F. Sonnett, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant.

Before JONES, Chief Justice, and LITTLETON, HOWELL, MADDEN, and WHITAKER, Judges.

LITTLETON, Judge.

Plaintiff brought this suit under a unit price contract with defendant to recover additional compensation in the total amount of $904,390.98 which he alleges became due him under the terms of the equitable adjustment provisions of Article 4 of the contract, quoted in finding 21. It is claimed that this amount, computed at $1.50 per cubic yard as a fair price for certain excavation, less 37 cents per cubic yard paid, should be allowed by reason of...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases