1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 165 F.2d
  5. 165 F.2d 683 (1948)
 

HAZELTINE CORPORATION v. KIRKPATRICK

Nos. 9488-9491.

165 F.2d 683 (1948)

HAZELTINE CORPORATION v. KIRKPATRICK, District Judge, and three other cases.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided January 7, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence B. Dodds, of New York City, and Leonard A. Watson, of New York City (Arthur G. Connolly, of Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for Hazeltine Corp. and Hazeltine Research, Inc.

Floyd H. Crews, of New York City (Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, and Hugh M. Morris and S. Samuel Arsht, both of Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for intervenors Crosley Corporation and Emerson Radio and Phonograph Corporation.

Before BIGGS, MARIS and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.

MARIS, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner, Hazeltine Corporation, is the defendant in two actions pending and undetermined in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. One was brought by Crosley Corporation and the other by Emerson Radio & Phonograph Corporation. Hazeltine Corporation asks this court for writs of prohibition and mandamus directed to the Honorable William H. Kirkpatrick, a district judge specially designated to sit in the district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases