1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 80 F.Supp.
  5. 80 F.Supp. 763 (1948)
 

HALL v. KELLER

Civ. 2315.

80 F.Supp. 763 (1948)

HALL v. KELLER et al.

United States District Court W. D. Louisiana, Lake Charles Division.

Judgment Modified February 2, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. Scofield and Claude W. Lowe, both of Kansas City, Mo., and Moss & Graham, of Lake Charles, La., for plaintiff.

Reginald E. Caughey, of Los Angeles, Cal., and Plauche & Stockwell, of Lake Charles, La., for defendants.

PORTERIE, District Judge.

The plaintiff bought the allegedly infringing device from J. Frank Keller, a resident of this District, at his place of business in this District; so follows our jurisdiction. Immediately, the manufacturer, the B. & W., Inc., by stipulation, became the real defendant and J. Frank Keller, the local dealer, went out of the suit. The device is a cement casing centralizer, used in the boring of oil wells.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases