GROMACKI v. ARMOUR & CO.

No. 4957.

76 F.Supp. 752 (1948)

GROMACKI v. ARMOUR & CO.

District Court, W. D. Missouri, W. D.

March 22, 1948.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. W. Prince, of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff.

Watson, Ess, Barnett, Whittaker & Marshall, of Kansas City, Mo., for defendant.


REEVES, District Judge.

The defendant has filed a motion (which under the new practice performs the office of a demurrer) to dismiss. The reason for the motion is briefly stated, "because the complaint fails to state a claim against the defendant upon which relief can be granted." To rule intelligently upon the motion it is necessary to examine the complaint to ascertain whether under any circumstances the plaintiff is entitled to the relief sought.

The action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases