PLUMMER v. MINNEAPOLIS-MOLINE POWER IMPLEMENT CO.

Civil Action No. 2037.

76 F.Supp. 745 (1948)

PLUMMER et al. v. MINNEAPOLIS-MOLINE POWER IMPLEMENT CO.

District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

February 3, 1948.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Loring M. Staples and John S. Pillsbury, Jr., both of Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant in support of the motion.

Douglas Hall, Wyman Smith, and Kenneth J. Enkel, all of Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiffs in opposition thereto.


NORDBYE, District Judge.

The motion is predicated on the grounds that defendant has conclusively shown that there was no express provision of a written or non-written contract, nor any custom or practice, to compensate these plaintiffs for the type of activity alleged to have been performed by them, and that therefore there can be no recovery under the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. § 251, et seq.

Plaintiffs were guards at defendant's plant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases