1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 76 F.Supp.
  5. 76 F.Supp. 735 (1948)
 

WARREN v. UNITED STATES

76 F.Supp. 735 (1948)

WARREN v. UNITED STATES et al. THE ANNA HOWARD SHAW.

District Court, S. D. New York.

March 4, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Saul Sperling, of New York City (Joseph Meehan, of New York City, of counsel), for libellant.

John F. X. McGohey, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Martin J. Norris, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent United States.

Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox & Keating, of New York City (Walter X. Connor, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent American South African Line, Inc.

MEDINA, District Judge.

In Shilman v. United States, 2 Cir., 164 F.2d 649, the Circuit Court of Appeals did not decide that a seaman may not recover maintenance and cure against a steamship company acting under a General Agency Agreement. The contention that the Circuit Court of Appeals would so hold, should such a case come before it, is based upon the statement at the end of the opinion that neither in the Hust case (Hust v. Moore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases