1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 76 F.Supp.
  5. 76 F.Supp. 703 (1948)
 

STANDARD PATENT PROC. CORP. v. ENDICOTT JOHNSON CORP.

Civ. No. 1340.

76 F.Supp. 703 (1948)

STANDARD PATENT PROCESS CORPORATION v. ENDICOTT JOHNSON CORPORATION.

District Court, N. D. New York.

February 5, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roy C. Hackley, Jr., of Washington, D. C. (Charles E. Nichols, of Albany, N. Y., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Howard A. Swartwood, of Endicott, N. Y. (Stephen H. Philbin and William J. Barnes, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

BRENNAN, District Judge.

This is essentially a patent infringement action. The issues of infringement, validity and laches are raised by the answer of the defendant.

The complaint contains a cause of action arising out of the alleged breach of a confidential disclosure which related to the process covered by plaintiff's patents. That issue was tried, and no serious contention is made that such cause of action was established. It was substantially abandoned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases