UNITED STATES v. MUTUAL NAT. BANK OF CHICAGO

No. 4513.

77 F.Supp. 609 (1948)

UNITED STATES v. MUTUAL NAT. BANK OF CHICAGO.

District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

February 5, 1948.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Otto Kerner, Jr., U. S. Dist. Atty., of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Francis E. Hinckley and Chester W. Kulp (of Rathje, Kulp, Sabel & Sullivan), both of Chicago, Ill., for defendant.


SULLIVAN, District Judge.

1. That the plaintiff is a corporation sovereign and body politic.

2. That the defendant is a national banking corporation duly organized, created and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the United States of America as a banking institution with its offices and principal place of business in Chicago, Illinois.

3. That one J. Roy Brangenberg and his wife, Nelda Brangenberg, are jointly and severally liable for income...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases