1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 81 F.Supp.
  5. 81 F.Supp. 511 (1948)
 

WABASH PHOTOLAMP CORP. v. ROSS ELECTRIC CORP.

Nos. 2430, 3534.

81 F.Supp. 511 (1948)

WABASH PHOTOLAMP CORPORATION et al. v. ROSS ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al. WABASH APPLIANCE CORPORATION v. ROSS ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

November 15, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenyon & Kenyon, of New York City (Theo. S. Kenyon, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Alexander C. Neave, of New York City, for defendants.

INCH, Chief Judge.

Defendants object to plaintiff's interrogatories in these patent suits. There are eight interrogatories. According to the brief submitted, after argument, by defendants they "waive their objections to all of the interrogatories except Interrogatories 3, 5, and 8". The ground for such objections to these is that the information would be relevant and material only to the question of damages, after a finding of validity and infringement of plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases