1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 84 F.Supp.
  5. 84 F.Supp. 361 (1948)
 

LAURICELLA v. UNITED STATES

84 F.Supp. 361 (1948)

LAURICELLA v. UNITED STATES et al.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

October 15, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene Pelcyger, Brooklyn, N. Y., proctor for libelant. Jacquin Frank, New York City, advocate.

John F. X. McGohey, United States Attorney, New York City, proctor for respondent United States of America, by Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox & Keating, New York City, advocates for said respondent and proctors for respondent American South African Line, Inc. Walter X. Connor, New York City, advocate.

HULBERT, District Judge.

Libelant sued in personam in Admiralty, to recover damages for personal injuries, and after a trial, the Court made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and a decree was entered thereon dismissing the suit. A notice of appeal has been filed.

The District Court is the proper tribunal to which application should be made for leave to prosecute said appeal in forma pauperis. Steffler v. United States, 319 U.S. 38

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases