1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 93 F.Supp.
  5. 93 F.Supp. 164 (1948)
 

NOLA ELECTRIC CO. v. REILLY

93 F.Supp. 164 (1948)

NOLA ELECTRIC CO., Inc. v. REILLY.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

On Motion for Reargument September 29, 1949.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Weil, Gotshal & Manges, New York City, for plaintiff.

William J. Mahon, New York City, for defendant. Matthias F. Correa, New York City, of counsel.

RYAN, District Judge.

Defendant, prior to answer, moves to dismiss the amended complaint upon the grounds that the claim pleaded is barred by the statute of limitations and that it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., 12(b), 28 U.S.C.A.

The original complaint was filed on December 24, 1947 and was served upon defendant on January 20, 1948. The amended complaint was served on February 11, 1948.

Here, Nola Electric...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases