HOYT v. MERRITT-CHAPMAN & SCOTT CORPORATION

Civil Action No. 10587.

79 F.Supp. 106 (1948)

HOYT et al. v. MERRITT-CHAPMAN & SCOTT CORPORATION.

District Court, D. New Jersey.

August 9, 1948.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George D. Rothermel, of Camden, N. J., for defendant, for the motion.

William B. Knight, of Camden, N. J., for plaintiffs, opposed.


MADDEN, District Judge.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint filed herein because the plaintiffs named therein have not filed with the Clerk of the Court the consents in writing to authorize the institution of such suit under Sections 5, 6 and 7, Part IV, Portal-to-Portal Pay Act of 1947, approved May 14, 1947. Title 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 251 to 262 incl.

Disposition of the case does not require consideration of the merits of the motion for in consideration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases