SKISLAK v. CONTINENTAL MINING & SMELTING CORP.


1 N.J. 167 (1948)

62 A.2d 397

MARY SKISLAK, PROSECUTOR-APPELLANT, v. THE CONTINENTAL MINING AND SMELTING CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 6, 1948.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Aaron A. Melniker argued the cause for prosecutor-appellant.

Mr. James J. Skeffington argued the cause for defendant-respondent.


The opinion of the court was delivered by OLIPHANT, J.

This is a Workmen's Compensation case wherein the dispositive question presented is, did the notice of motion for a dismissal of the claim petition sufficiently comply with the statutory requirements of R.S. 34:15-54? We think it did not.

Prosecutor-appellant filed a petition with the Workmen's Compensation Bureau on October 21, 1943 seeking recovery of compensation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases