1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 1 N.J.
  5. 1 N.J. Super. 151 (1948)
 

STATE v. VIGORITO

1 N.J. Super. 151 (1948)

62 A.2d 823

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT, v. ANTHONY VIGORITO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 29, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edward H. Saltzman argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Mr. Edward H. Saltzman, attorney).

Mr. Manfield G. Amlicke, Prosecutor of the Pleas of the County of Passaic, argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. Manfield G. Amlicke, attorney).

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.

The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, J.A.D.

This appeal brings up for review the conviction of defendant-appellant (hereinafter called Vigorito) under an indictment charging him with receiving stolen property, consisting of 16 rolls of Dobby Luana 100% acetate material, of the value of $676.80, and the property of Grant Dyeing & Finishing Co., at Paterson, New Jersey, on May 23, 1946, "well knowing the said property, goods and chattels to have been...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases