ZIEGLER v. SUTPHIN


1 N.J. Super. 147 (1948)

62 A.2d 750

CLARENCE ZIEGLER AND ANOTHER, APPELLANTS, v. FORMAN SUTPHIN AND OTHERS, RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 29, 1948.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Meyer M. Semel argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Heuser & Heuser, proctors).

Mr. M. Raymond McGowan argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Andrew J. Conover, proctor for respondents, Forman Sutphin and others).

(Messrs. Birdsall & Madigan, proctors for respondent, Edwin R. Smock).

Mr. Ernest Fasano argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Quinn, Doremus, McCue & Russell, attorneys).

Before Judges JACOBS, EASTWOOD and BIGELOW.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.

The Monmouth County Orphans' Court admitted to probate as the will of Edward R. Heyer, deceased, a certain paper writing with the exception of the fourth paragraph therein which the court found that the testator had revoked. The paragraph excepted from probate gave the residue of testator's estate to Clarence Ziegler and Ethel, his wife. They appeal from so much of the decree of the Orphans' Court as denies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases