HYMAN v. MULLER


1 N.J. 124 (1948)

62 A.2d 221

BEAUMONT HYMAN, COMPLAINANT, v. HENRY C. MULLER, WILLIAM MULLER AND FRED MULLER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND LAVERNE M. FAKE, RECEIVER, RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 22, 1948.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Messrs. Weber & Muth, solicitors).

Mr. L. Stanley Ford argued the cause for the respondent receiver, Laverne M. Fake.


The opinion of the court was delivered by HEHER, J.

The question here is whether an order directing appellants to turn over three motor trucks and other property to the receiver of a partnership found to exist between complainant and appellants is ineffective for want of procedural due process.

The receiver was appointed April 23, 1947 under R.S. 42:4-1, et seq., on bill for dissolution of the partnership alleged and an accounting and incidental...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases