PER CURIAM.
Appellant urges that this court erred (1) as to the facts regarding the premium base, and (2) in failing to hold appellant entitled to interest under the doctrine of res judicata.
Apparently the facts concerning which we allegedly erred are comprised in the testimony of the Government engineer that he had no way of determining exactly the payroll amounts in question. This fact we recognized in our opinion. From this fact appellant concludes that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
