GOERIG v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO.

Nos. 11722-11726.

167 F.2d 930 (1948)

GOERIG et al. v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO. GOERIG et al. v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 5, 1948.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brown & Hawkins, of Yakima, Wash., and Ferguson, Burdell & Armstrong, of Seattle, Wash., for appellants.

Skeel, McKelvy, Henke, Evenson & Uhlmann and Willard E. Skeel, all of Seattle, Wash., for appellee.

Before GARRECHT, DENMAN and HEALY, Circuit Judges.


DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

These five appeals, each having identical issues, were briefed and argued together. Each suit was brought against the Continental Casualty Company, hereafter called Continental, under the Miller Act, 49 Stat. 793 et seq., 40 U.S.C. 270a, 270b, 40 U.S.C.A. §§ 270a, 270b, by the United States as use plaintiff for a subcontractor supplying labor or materials on government construction contracts made by a group of joint adventurers, of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases