1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 170 F.2d
  5. 170 F.2d 914 (1948)
 

RAYLITE ELECTRIC CORP. v. NOMA ELECTRIC CORP.

No. 45, Docket 21067.

170 F.2d 914 (1948)

RAYLITE ELECTRIC CORPORATION v. NOMA ELECTRIC CORPORATION (OTIS, Intervener).

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

November 29, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pennie, Edmonds, Morton & Barrows, of New York City (Lewis Barnett and Daniel V. Mahoney, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Byerly, Townsend & Watson, of New York City (Ralph M. Watson, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before L. HAND, Chief Judge, and SWAN and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

This action for a declaratory judgment was brought by the plaintiff (Raylite) against the defendant (Noma) because of a controversy between them with respect to three patents of which Noma was an exclusive licensee.1 Raylite was manufacturing and offering for sale "ornamental illuminated bubbling devices" which Noma had claimed by letters to Raylite and its customers to be infringements of each of the three Otis patents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases