PER CURIAM.
The suit was for damages for personal injuries. The claim was that they resulted from the negligence of the Respondent in maintaining the place where Libellant had to go in an unsafe condition without warning Libellant thereof.
The defense was a denial of fault and a plea of contributory negligence.
The district judge found for the Libellant on his claim of negligence and against the Respondent's claim of contributory negligence. He awarded...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
