1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 76 F.Supp.
  5. 76 F.Supp. 946 (1948)
 

STAMEY v. STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION OF KANSAS

Civ. No. 6051.

76 F.Supp. 946 (1948)

STAMEY et al. v. STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION OF KANSAS et al.

District Court, D. Kansas, First Division.

April 12, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tincher, Raleigh & Tincher, of Hutchinson, Kan., and Cunningham, Walker & Cunningham, of Arkansas City, Kan., for plaintiffs.

Douglas Hudson, of Fort Scott, Kan., and Taylor, Anderson & Steinrauf, State Highway Commission, of Topeka, Kan., for defendants.

BROADDUS, District Judge.

1. The plaintiffs, Cleve Stamey of the State of Kansas and Thomas Stamey of Oklahoma, a copartnership with its principal place of business within Kansas, bring this action against the State Highway Commission of the State of Kansas under the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. § 400, for a declaration of the rights and obligations of the parties under a certain contract for highway construction let...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases