1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 78 F.Supp.
  5. 78 F.Supp. 943 (1948)
 

SANDIFER v. ELECTROLUX CORPORATION

Civil Action No. 1832.

78 F.Supp. 943 (1948)

SANDIFER v. ELECTROLUX CORPORATION.

District Court, E. D. South Carolina, Columbia Division.

July 12, 1948.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. S. Weatherford, Jr., of Columbia, S. C., and Murchison & West, of Camden, S. C., for plaintiff.

McKay & McKay, of Columbia, S. C., for defendant.

TIMMERMAN, District Judge.

I have for consideration the motion of the plaintiff for a new trial. This is an action for damages based upon an alleged slander. The case was tried with a jury April 15, 16, 1948. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant.

Upon the trial of the case I held and instructed the jury that the words complained of as having been spoken of and concerning the plaintiff by an agent of the defendant were not defamatory per se and consequently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases