MacDONALD v. WINFIELD CORPORATION

Civ. A. No. 8708.

82 F.Supp. 929 (1948)

MacDONALD et al. v. WINFIELD CORPORATION et al.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

December 30, 1948.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry Temin, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Owen B. Rhoads and Raymond J. Bradley, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.


KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.

This is a civil action based on breach of contract and tort. There are two defendants, both corporations — Winfield (successor to Phoenix) and Virginia Metal Products (successor to Snead). The second defendant has moved to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action.

Laying aside the question whether the facts set out in the complaint are enough to bring Snead into the tort case as a subsequent participant in the program...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases