SOMERVILLE DRESSED MEAT CO. v. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION

No. 335.

159 F.2d 716 (1947)

SOMERVILLE DRESSED MEAT CO. v. RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION.

United States Emergency Court of Appeals.

Decided February 5, 1947.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Kruger, of Boston, Mass. (Martin Ritvo, of Cambridge, Mass., and Widett & Kruger, of Boston, Mass., on the brief), for complainant.

John C. Erickson, of Washington, D. C. (John D. Goodloe, George B. Stoner, and James L. Dougherty, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before MARIS, Chief Judge, and MAGRUDER and McALLISTER, Judges.


Heard at Boston January 13, 1947.

MAGRUDER, Judge.

This complaint challenges the validity of a provision of Amendment No. 2 (9 F.R. 1820) to Regulation No. 3 (8 F.R. 10826) issued by the Defense Supplies Corporation, under which provision respondent has ruled that Somerville Dressed Meat Company, complainant, was ineligible, during the period November 1, 1943, to January 17, 1944, to receive the special subsidy of 80¢ per cwt. payable to nonprocessing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases