1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 72 F.Supp.
  5. 72 F.Supp. 6 (1947)
 

HOUCK v. JOSE

No. 703.

72 F.Supp. 6 (1947)

HOUCK et al. v. JOSE et al.

District Court, S. D. California, Central Division.

June 14, 1947.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Orris R. Hedges and Monta W. Shirley, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs. For the Defendants:

William W. Kaye, Reynolds & Painter, and Howard Painter, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants Hammond and others.

Michael F. Shannon and Thomas A. Wood, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant Jose and others.

YANKWICH, District Judge.

By their complaint, Stanley B. Houck and others seek to quiet title to sixteen placer mining claims containing deposits of montmorillonite, all located in Imperial County, California, and being in Township 14 South, Range 12 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian.

At the trial I expressed doubt whether one who has no greater interest than a mining location could bring an action to quiet title. A further study of the problem has led...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases