BICKART v. UNION BARGE LINE CORPORATION

Civ. No. 6222.

75 F.Supp. 572 (1947)

BICKART v. UNION BARGE LINE CORPORATION.

District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

September 12, 1947.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schlesinger & Schlesinger, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Dalzell, McFall, Pringle & Bredin, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.


GIBSON, District Judge.

The defendant has filed a motion for judgment and in the alternative for a new trial. The action was properly submitted to the jury, in the opinion of the court, and the motion for judgment must be denied.

The verdict justifies a strong suspicion that the jury had blundered in part. It was admitted that the defendant, pursuant to an attempted settlement, had paid plaintiff the sum of $1,400, and in the charge the jury was told that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases