CALIFORNIA CASUALTY INDEMNITY EXCH. v. UNITED STATES

Civ. Nos. 4850-4853.

74 F.Supp. 408 (1947)

CALIFORNIA CASUALTY INDEMNITY EXCHANGE et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. (three cases). INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY EXCHANGE et al. v. SAME.

District Court, S. D. California, Central Division.

November 4, 1947.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Oliver and Corfman and Forrest A. Betts, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for complainants and libelants.

James M. Carter, U. S. Atty., Robert E. Wright, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Lillick, Geary & McHose, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent United States.

Jennings & Belcher, of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent Union Oil Co. of California.


HALL, District Judge.

Respondent Union Oil Company submitted a brief on the question of laches as to the delay in serving process on it. Libelant waived both brief and argument.

The Motion to Dismiss as to respondent Union Oil Company is well taken.

Service of process on this respondent is not governed by a specific statute, as is the case with the United States as respondent.

But, courts of admiralty apply the equitable principle of laches...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases