1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 71 F.Supp.
  5. 71 F.Supp. 401 (1947)
 

UNITED STATES v. DAVIDSON

No. 1583.

71 F.Supp. 401 (1947)

UNITED STATES, for Use and Benefit of W. A. RUSHLIGHT CO. et al. v. DAVIDSON et al.

District Court, D. Idaho, N. D.

April 16, 1947.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lycette, Diamond & Sylvester, of Seattle, Wash., and J. Ward Arney, of Coeur d' Alene, Idaho, for plaintiff.

Burkey & Burkey, of Tacoma, Wash., and Hawley & Hawley, of Boise, Idaho, for defendant C. F. Davidson Co.

Oscar W. Worthwine, of Boise, Idaho, for defendant Continental Casualty Co.

Henry Arnold Peterson, of Tacoma, Wash., for third-party plaintiff William J. Parker.

CLARK, District Judge.

This is an action prosecuted by the plaintiffs, W. A. Rushlight Company, Rushlight Automatic Sprinkler Company and Montgomery Electric Company, against the defendants C. F. Davidson and C. W. Reid as C. F. Davidson Company and Continental Casualty Company, with the defendant Continental Casualty Company appearing by separate answer to the complaint and cross complaint against the defendants C. F. Davidson and C. W. Reid.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases