KATZENBERG v. CLARK

No. 404.

163 F.2d 259 (1947)

KATZENBERG et al. v. CLARK, Director of the Division of Liquidation, Department of Commerce.

United States Emergency Court of Appeals.

Decided July 29, 1947.

Rehearing Denied August 18, 1947.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ben W. Heineman, of Chicago, Ill., (Swiren, Heineman & Antonow, of Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for complainants.

Israel Convisser, of Washington, D. C. (Carl A. Auerbach, Harry H. Schneider, and Stanley Riesner, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before MARIS, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and LINDLEY, Judges.


Heard at Philadelphia May 5, 1947.

MARIS, Chief Judge.

The complainants, manufacturers of Women's garments, are subject to Maximum Price Regulation No. 570 — Women's, Misses' and Children's Underwear, Night-wear and Negligee Garments.1 The "brunch" coats which the complainants manufacture are properly classified in category 225 and the women's two-piece pajama sets in category 221, as those categories are described in Appendix...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases