1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 75 F.Supp.
  5. 75 F.Supp. 282 (1947)
 

ALAMEDA v. PARAFFINE COMPANIES

Nos. 26737-R, 26756-H, 26759-R, 26777-G, 26781-G.

75 F.Supp. 282 (1947)

ALAMEDA et al. v. PARAFFINE COMPANIES, Inc., et al. and four other cases.

District Court, N. D. California, S. D.

November 24, 1947.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gladstein, Anderson, Sawyer & Resner, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, of San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.

Before ROCHE, GOODMAN, and HARRIS, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It is ordered that the motions of the above-named defendants to dismiss the complaints of the plaintiffs herein be and the same hereby are granted and said complaints are hereby dismissed by reason of the lack of jurisdiction of the United States District Court over such actions. Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, Section 2(a) (b) (c) and (d), Chapter 52, Public Law 49, 29 U.S.C.A. § 252(a-d); Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b), 28 U.S.C.A. following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases