BIGROW v. HIATT

No. 196.

74 F.Supp. 240 (1947)

BIGROW v. HIATT et al.

District Court, M. D. Pennsylvania.

November 7, 1947.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Bigrow, pro se.

Charles W. Kalp, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Lewisburg, Pa. (Major Thayer Chapman, of Washington, D. C., and Arthur A. Maguire, U. S. Atty., of Scranton, Pa., of counsel), for respondents.


FOLLMER, District Judge.

After hearing had and opinion filed,1 Petitioner alleged that when the response was served upon him it was not accompanied by a copy of the Court-Martial Record which had been attached as an exhibit to the original copy of the response as filed. Petitioner did not call this to the Court's attention and made no reference thereto until after the Court's opinion had been filed and an appeal noted. The Court-Martial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases