ages/logo.png">
Leagle.com Leagle.com Leagle.com
Sign in
 

STATE v. PULLEY

Opinion No. 27811.

423 S.C. 371 (2018)

815 S.E.2d 461

The STATE, Respondent, v. Timothy Artez PULLEY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Filed June 6, 2018.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clarence R. Wise , of Greenwood, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson and Assistant Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr. , both of Columbia, and Solicitor David M. Stumbo , of Greenwood, for Respondent.


Timothy Pulley appeals his conviction for trafficking cocaine base (cocaine) of ten grams or more, but less than twenty-eight grams in violation of section 44-53-375(C)(1) of the South Carolina Code (2018). Pulley alleges the trial court erred in: (1) charging a permissive inference that knowledge and possession of a substance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases

    RATLIFF v. COMMISSIONER | 6 T.C.M. 1103 (1947) | tcm11031829 | Leagle.com
     

    RATLIFF v. COMMISSIONER

    Docket No. 12126.

    6 T.C.M. 1103 (1947)

    Martha B. Ratliff v. Commissioner.

    United States Tax Court.

    Entered October 13, 1947.


    Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

    Frank E. Wood, Jr., Esq., Frank E. Wood, Esq., and Robert S. Marx, Esq., 900 Traction Bldg., Cincinnati, Ohio, for the petitioner. A. J. Friedman, Esq., for the respondent.


    Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

    The Commissioner has determined a deficiency in petitioner's income tax for the year, 1943 of $8,453.03. This deficiency is due to one adjustment made to the net income of $71,866.37 disclosed by the return of petitioner filed for the taxable year. That adjustment was the disallowance of a loss of $10,505.80 claimed by petitioner as a deduction on her income tax return. The Commissioner explained the adjustment in his deficiency...

    Let's get started

    Leagle.com

    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
    Sign on now to see your case.
    Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

    • Updated daily.
    • Uncompromising quality.
    • Complete, Accurate, Current.

    Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

    Cited Cases

    • No Cases Found

    Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

    Citing Cases