1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 73 F.Supp.
  5. 73 F.Supp. 955 (1947)
 

DITTO v. AMERICAN ALUMINUM CO.

No. 6280.

73 F.Supp. 955 (1947)

DITTO et al. v. AMERICAN ALUMINUM CO.

District Court, S. D. California, Central Division.

June 14, 1947.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vincent A. Marco, of Beverly Hills, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Latham & Watkins, Paul R. Watkins, and Richard W. Lund, all of Los Angeles, Cal., and Smith, Buchanan & Ingersoll and Leon E. Hickman, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

YANKWICH, District Judge.

The above action came on regularly to be heard on the 9th day of June, 1947, upon the motion of defendant, Aluminum Company of America, sued herein as American Aluminum Company, to dismiss said action, and the Court having heard the arguments of counsel and being fully advised in the premises found that said motion should be granted and said action dismissed upon the grounds and for the reason stated in defendant's Notice of Motion, that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases