1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 65 F.Supp.
  5. 65 F.Supp. 916 (1946)
 

REYNOLDS v. REYNOLDS

Civil Action No. 619.

65 F.Supp. 916 (1946)

REYNOLDS v. REYNOLDS et al.

District Court, W. D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division.

June 3, 1946.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. L. Smith, of Tulsa, Okl., for plaintiff.

Milton W. Hardy, of Hardy & Hardy, all of Tulsa, Okl., for defendants.

JOHN E. MILLER, District Judge.

Issue is joined on defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint under Rule 12(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, on the ground that the court lacks jurisdiction of the case because the requisite jurisdictional amount is not involved. 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(1). The question was submitted to the court on oral argument and briefs of respective counsel.

The original complaint was filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases