1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 158 F.2d
  5. 158 F.2d 803 (1946)
 

SUPAK v. PORTER

Nos. 246, 257.

158 F.2d 803 (1946)

SUPAK et al. v. PORTER.

United States Emergency Court of Appeals.

Reheard October 17, 1946.

Decided December 2, 1946.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Josiah E. Brill, of Minneapolis, Minn., for complainants.

William R. Ming, Jr., Chief, Court Review Price Branch, and Israel Convisser, both of Washington, D. C. (Richard H. Field, Gen. Counsel, and Carl A. Auerbach, Associate Gen. Counsel, OPA, both of Washington, D. C., and Murray Steyer, of Brooklyn, N. Y., on the brief), for respondent.

Before MARIS, Chief Judge, and MAGRUDER, McALLISTER, LINDLEY and LAWS, Judges.

Heard at St. Paul, August 29, 1946.

Reheard at Chicago, October 17, 1946.

LINDLEY, Judge.

These two consolidated causes present an issue as to the validity of Section 13(a) of Revised Maximum Price Regulation No. 287 (8 F.R. 9122) issued and effective June 29, 1943. The first is a proceeding under Section 204(e) (1) of the Emergency Price Control Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 924(e) (1), and the second a complaint to review the denial of a protest...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases