CROSLEY CORPORATION v. HAZELTINE CORPORATION

Civ. A. No. 783.

66 F.Supp. 893 (1946)

CROSLEY CORPORATION v. HAZELTINE CORPORATION.

District Court, D. Delaware.

May 23, 1946.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morris, Steel, Nicholas & Arsht, of Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

Arthur G. Connolly, of Wilmington, Del., and Leonard A. Watson and Laurence B. Dodds, both of New York City, for defendant.


KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This is a civil action for a declaratory judgment and asks that eleven patents, having to do with radio receiving sets and owned by the defendant at the time the complaint was filed, be declared invalid and not infringed by the plaintiff. The motion is to dismiss the action, but both sides filed affidavits and at the argument it was agreed that the Court might treat the motion as one for summary judgment by the defendant, under Federal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases