1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 64 F.Supp.
  5. 64 F.Supp. 872 (1946)
 

UNITED BRICK & CLAY WORKERS v. ROBINSON CLAY PROD. CO.

Civ. No. 23226.

64 F.Supp. 872 (1946)

UNITED BRICK & CLAY WORKERS OF AMERICA v. ROBINSON CLAY PRODUCT CO. et al.

District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

January 31, 1946.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. M. Rust, of Mansfield, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Robert Guinther, of Akron, Ohio, for defendants Robinson Clay Product Co., Stowe-Fuller Refractories Co. and Thomas Rockwell.

Hubbard, Baker & Rice, of Chicago, Ill., and Paul H. Torbet, of Cleveland, Ohio, for other defendants.

Don C. Miller, U. S. Dist. Atty., and F. Kavanagh, Asst. U. S. Dist. Atty., both of Cleveland, Ohio, amici curiæ.

JONES, District Judge.

Robinson Clay Product Company and Stowe-Fuller Refractories Company operate clay processing plants in Ohio, and Thomas Rockwell is an officer of each of the two companies. The two corporations subscribe to an employers service furnished by Stevenson, Jordon & Harrison, Inc., for which E. W. Marcellus is an agent. The remaining twelve defendants are members of the Fifth Regional War Labor Board.

Plaintiff, the collective bargaining...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases