PAULING v. PAULING

Civ. No. 1428.

65 F.Supp. 814 (1946)

PAULING v. PAULING.

District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

May 15, 1946.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry Mackall (of Stinchfield, Mackall, Crounse & Moore), of Minneapolis, Minn., and L. A. Stebbins (of Stebbins & Pierce), of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Charles F. Noonan (of Dorsey, Colman, Barker, Scott & Barber), of Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant.


NORDBYE, District Judge.

Plaintiff and defendant each seek a summary judgment in their favor. They rely upon the following undisputed facts: On May 13, 1932, the plaintiff, Ethel S. Pauling, and one John W. Pauling were divorced. Shortly thereafter, John W. Pauling married defendant, who was his wife when he died on January 12, 1945. According to the divorce decree which was obtained by plaintiff, Pauling was required to pay her alimony at the rate of $250 per month...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases