1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 64 F.Supp.
  5. 64 F.Supp. 696 (1946)
 

ARALAC, INC. v. HAT CORPORATION

No. 532.

64 F.Supp. 696 (1946)

ARALAC, Inc., v. HAT CORPORATION OF AMERICA.

District Court, D. Delaware.

March 4, 1946.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Worthington Campbell and Mark N. Donohue (of Hoguet, Neary & Campbell), of New York City, and William S. Potter (of Southerland, Berl & Potter), of Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

Drury W. Cooper and Bertram F. Shipman, both of New York City, and Caleb S. Layton (of Richards, Layton & Finger), of Wilmington, Del., for defendant.

LEAHY, District Judge.

For the purposes of the motion to dismiss, the allegations of the complaint will be accepted.1 Hat manufacturers buy plaintiff's fibres for use in making fur felt hats. Statements attributable to defendant are that it has asserted to plaintiff's customers that defendant's patents encompass the use of casein fibres in such manufacture. For example, a certain letter charged one of plaintiff's largest customers —...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases