FLOYD v. RING CONST. CORPORATION

No. 1330.

66 F.Supp. 436 (1946)

FLOYD v. RING CONST. CORPORATION.

District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division.

June 1, 1946.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard, Street & Deinard, of Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff.

Brill, Maslon, Grossman & Brill, of Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant.


JOYCE, District Judge.

This suit is on an employment contract. Defendant is a construction contractor. Plaintiff was one of its superintendents and had for many years worked as an estimator and superintendent of construction for defendant. His compensation was fixed by a contract executed June 3, 1941, at a stated salary plus a percentage of the net profits on construction work that he estimated and supervised. In 1942 defendant bid on and was awarded by the United...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases